Militancy, Insurgency and the Afghan Spillover
The scale of recent violence is striking. Between May 1 and May 17, 2026, Pakistan recorded 57 terrorism-related incidents, causing 200 fatalities, including 85 security force personnel, 58 terrorists, and 47 civilians. Several major attacks during this period demonstrate the intensity of the threat. In Balochistan, suspected Baloch insurgents killed three military personnel in Kech District on May 17, while Baloch Liberation Army cadres killed six security personnel in Dalbandin and three others in Mastung on May 16. Earlier, on May 13, security forces suffered further losses in Barkhan, Noshki, and Mastung. In Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, nine TTP militants and four security force personnel were killed during an attack on an Army camp in Bajaur on May 14, while a suicide bombing and subsequent assault on a police post in Bannu on May 10 killed 15 policemen.
These incidents reflect two overlapping theatres of insecurity. In Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, the dominant threat comes from the TTP’s resurgence. In Balochistan, the principal challenge is the intensification of Baloch nationalist insurgency, led by groups such as the BLA, BLF, BRG, and the BRAS alliance. Yet the distinction between these theatres is becoming less rigid. Islamist militant groups, including the TTP and Islamic State-linked entities, have found space in Balochistan’s disorder, while Baloch insurgents have increasingly demonstrated the capacity to strike security forces, convoys, mineral transport routes, checkpoints, and highways.
The broader trend is even more alarming. Pakistan recorded 4,001 terrorism-linked fatalities in 2025, up from 2,236 in 2024, an increase of almost 79 per cent. This reversed the earlier decline in violence seen between 2015 and 2019. Since 2020, terrorism-related incidents have increased steadily, rising from 319 in 2020 to 1,720 in 2025. If the pace recorded in early 2026 continues, the current year could surpass the already severe levels of 2025.
The return of the Taliban to power in Afghanistan in August 2021 is central to this deterioration. Pakistan had expected the Afghan Taliban to restrain the TTP, but those expectations have collapsed. Instead, Afghanistan has become a sanctuary from which militants are able to organise, train, regroup, and launch attacks into Pakistan. The collapse of peace talks between the Pakistan Government and the TTP in November 2022 further accelerated the conflict, with the TTP leadership calling for renewed attacks across the country.
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa has borne the brunt of this resurgence. In 2025, the province recorded 2,359 terrorism-related fatalities, the highest annual toll there since 2009. The TTP has exploited terrain, tribal networks, cross-border sanctuaries, and local political-criminal linkages to rebuild its operational base. Pakistan’s military has responded with a vast number of intelligence-based operations, but the continuing frequency of attacks suggests that kinetic operations alone have not restored control.
Balochistan presents a different but equally serious challenge. In 2025, the province recorded 1,534 terrorism-related fatalities, almost double the 2024 figure. This was the highest annual fatality count recorded in Balochistan since the South Asia Terrorism Portal began documenting such data. The insurgency there is driven by long-standing Baloch grievances over enforced disappearances, extrajudicial killings, political exclusion, resource extraction, and economic neglect. These grievances have allowed armed nationalist groups to present themselves as defenders of Baloch rights against a coercive and extractive state.
The operational claims of Baloch insurgent groups also indicate growing confidence. The BLA, BLF, BRG, and BRAS all issued annual reports for 2025 claiming hundreds of attacks and heavy security force casualties. While insurgent claims are often difficult to verify and may be inflated, the broader evidence of attacks on convoys, checkpoints, highways, and mineral transport routes suggests that these groups have significantly expanded their reach. Political leaders in Balochistan have openly acknowledged that ministers can no longer safely travel by road to their own constituencies, a sign of the state’s shrinking authority across parts of the province.
Pakistan’s crisis is also being internationalised through its deteriorating relationship with Afghanistan. Border clashes, militant infiltration, artillery exchanges, and airstrikes have become recurring features of the Afghanistan-Pakistan frontier. In 2025 alone, at least 24 cross-border militant attacks from Afghanistan into Pakistan were recorded, resulting in 222 deaths. The situation worsened dramatically in early 2026, when cross-border fighting escalated into broader military confrontation. According to a UNAMA report, at least 372 civilians were killed and 397 injured in Afghanistan-Pakistan cross-border clashes during the first three months of 2026.
This widening confrontation has trapped Pakistan between internal insurgency and external escalation. Islamabad accuses Kabul of harbouring and enabling the TTP, while the Afghan Taliban rejects Pakistani pressure and responds forcefully to cross-border strikes. The result is a volatile security environment in which militant attacks, retaliatory operations, and civilian casualties feed one another.
Although Punjab and Sindh remain comparatively less affected by terrorism than KP and Balochistan, they are not insulated from instability. Sindh recorded a rise in terrorism-linked fatalities in 2025, while Karachi continued to suffer from high levels of street crime. Punjab saw a decline in terrorism-related fatalities in 2025, but its relative calm depends heavily on preventing the spillover of militant networks from the border provinces.
Pakistan’s ranking at the top of the Global Terrorism Index 2026 underlines the severity of the challenge. The country is facing a convergence of threats: the TTP’s renewed insurgency, Baloch nationalist militancy, Islamic State-linked activity, cross-border violence with Afghanistan, and deepening governance failures in conflict-affected regions. These threats cannot be resolved by military means alone.
A durable response would require Pakistan to combine security operations with political engagement, especially in Balochistan, where decades of coercive policy have deepened alienation. In KP, counter-terrorism efforts must address the networks that enable the TTP’s local recruitment, financing, and movement. At the regional level, Pakistan and Afghanistan need mechanisms to prevent border clashes and manage militant sanctuaries, although current relations make this difficult.
Pakistan’s present trajectory is deeply worrying. The country is no longer dealing with isolated militant incidents but with a multi-front security crisis. Unless the state addresses both the armed manifestations of violence and the political conditions that sustain them, terrorism and insurgency are likely to intensify further, leaving civilians, security personnel, and fragile provincial institutions exposed to prolonged instability.










