Stringer Asia Logo
Share on Google+
news of the day
in depth
Afghanistan: Gender Apartheid, Armed Resistance, and a State Adrift
  • Gender Apartheid
    Gender Apartheid
Nearly four years after the Taliban re-entered Kabul on August 15, 2021, Afghanistan remains locked in a deepening crisis that is political, humanitarian, economic and moral all at once. The movement’s battlefield victory did not translate into legitimacy or stability. Instead, the country has drifted into a system defined by coercion, isolation and institutional decay.

A turning point in the international legal arena came on July 8, 2025, when the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Taliban Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada and Chief Justice Abdul Hakim Haqqani. The charges relate to crimes against humanity, specifically gender-based persecution under Article 7(1)(h) of the Rome Statute. The Taliban rejected the move outright, insisting that the Islamic Emirate does not recognize the ICC. Yet the warrants marked the first formal attempt to hold the movement’s top leadership accountable for the systematic repression of women and girls.

That repression has hardened into policy architecture. Since returning to power, the Taliban have issued at least 470 decrees, including 79 directly targeting women and girls. Education beyond primary school remains closed to girls. Women have been barred from most forms of employment, with roughly 90 percent excluded from the workforce and only a small fraction allowed to work outside the home. The United Nations estimates that restrictions on women could cost Afghanistan nearly USD 920 million between 2024 and 2026, a devastating blow to an already collapsed economy.

Public punishments have become a tool of social control. In 2025 alone, at least 672 individuals—125 of them women—were subjected to judicially sanctioned flogging. Stadium executions have returned. On December 2, 2025, a man was executed publicly in Khost before tens of thousands of spectators. The normalization of corporal and capital punishment reinforces a culture of fear, particularly for women who face accusations related to “morality” offenses under the Taliban’s rigid interpretation of Shari’a.

In January 2026, the Taliban promulgated a new Criminal Procedure Code spanning 119 articles. It formalizes harsh penalties and demands obedience to more than 200 prior decrees, many of which disproportionately affect women. Legal recourse has narrowed to near nonexistence. Women judges have been removed, female lawyers silenced, and women’s shelters dismantled. In effect, the justice system now functions as an enforcement arm of ideological discipline rather than an instrument of rights protection.

At the same time, armed resistance continues, even if at reduced intensity. The National Resistance Front carried out 79 attacks in 2025, killing 182 Taliban fighters. The Afghanistan Freedom Front conducted 76 incidents, killing 168 Taliban fighters. While fatalities declined compared to 2024, insurgent operations persisted across Herat, Kabul, Badakhshan, Takhar and other provinces. The Taliban’s claim of total internal consolidation masks a reality of simmering conflict.

Parallel to resistance activity, extremist violence has not disappeared. The Islamic State – Khorasan Province remains active, with an estimated 2,000 fighters. In January 2026, a bombing in Kabul’s Shahr-e-Naw district killed at least seven people, including a Chinese national. Russia has warned that IS-KP’s influence is expanding, and international observers question whether Taliban countermeasures are sufficient or selective.

Afghanistan also continues to host more than 20 regional and transnational militant groups, including Al Qaeda and the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan. Reports of TTP families relocated inside Afghanistan, and calls by former Haqqani commanders to support TTP operations, complicate regional stability. Border clashes with Pakistan in late 2025 left dozens of civilians dead and hundreds wounded, further isolating the country diplomatically.

Even where the Taliban claim institutional strengthening—boasting of 500,000 security operations in 2025 and a defence force exceeding 181,000 personnel—governance remains hollow. Crime statistics released by Taliban authorities themselves show a sharp increase in criminal cases since 2021, including a rise in recorded murders. Law enforcement capacity may be expanding, but law and justice are increasingly conflated with ideological enforcement.

The humanitarian landscape is equally bleak. About 70 percent of Afghans live in poverty. More than 21 million people are projected to require humanitarian assistance in 2026. Acute food insecurity affects 17.4 million people, with 4.7 million in emergency conditions. Drought grips multiple provinces. Over 422 healthcare facilities have shut down, leaving millions without access to essential services. Women, especially in rural areas, face severe barriers to medical care due to travel restrictions, lack of female health workers, and economic deprivation.

The forced return of more than 5.2 million Afghans from Iran and Pakistan between January and November 2025 has added strain to fragile communities. Many deportees return to unemployment, displacement and aid dependency. For women, reintegration often means re-entering a society where education, employment and mobility are sharply curtailed.

Internally, power struggles persist. Kandahar-based hardliners around Akhundzada dominate key posts, while figures associated with the Haqqani Network have occasionally voiced dissatisfaction. Interior Minister Sirajuddin Haqqani publicly warned against ruling through fear, yet fear remains the regime’s primary instrument. Strategic sites in Kandahar have been fortified, reflecting anxiety within the leadership itself.

Meanwhile, illicit economies expand. Despite formal bans, methamphetamine production has surged, and narcotics trafficking routes remain active. Ephedra-based synthetic drugs are increasingly replacing opium as traffickers adapt. Criminal networks thrive in an environment where formal economic opportunity is scarce.

For Afghan women, the cumulative effect is suffocating. Excluded from schools, universities, most workplaces, public life, and meaningful legal recourse, they face systematic erasure from civic space. The ICC warrants have amplified international scrutiny, but inside Afghanistan, enforcement mechanisms remain firmly in Taliban hands. Gender persecution is not incidental policy; it is foundational to the regime’s ideological identity.

Afghanistan’s trajectory in 2025 and early 2026 reflects drift rather than recovery. Armed resistance endures, extremist groups remain active, regional tensions simmer, and the humanitarian crisis deepens. The Taliban project order through checkpoints, decrees and public punishments, yet the underlying structures of governance—economic productivity, inclusive institutions, social trust—are fragile or absent.

Authority built primarily on coercion can impose silence, but it cannot generate legitimacy. Without inclusive reform, restoration of women’s rights, credible accountability and sustained regional engagement, Afghanistan’s layered crisis will not resolve. It will calcify, leaving an entire generation—especially its women—confined not only by poverty and conflict, but by law itself.
@COOKIE1@
@COOKIE2@